Ford's Hydrogen Vehicles

On July 10, John Ford released a fourth estate statement that discussed their advancement and the hereafter of H vehicles. Are their release believable or just a fume and mirrors maneuver to acquire people excited about the company?

Ford rolled out a 12-passenger parking batch shuttlecock bus, which is powered by a 6.8-liter internal burning H engine.

Ford is speedy to point out that the engine isn't ready for general consumer use just yet. According to the release, it will take five years—or longer—before John John Ford can legitimately entertain the thought of putting H autos in the marketplace.

While this mightiness be a measure in the right direction, H vehicles powered by combustible cells won't be seen until at least 2015, said George C. Scott Staley, main applied scientist of Ford's H and combustible cell engineering department.

So, the inquiry remains. Are this really an environmental-friendly development or just another fourth estate release of a troubled company?

Every major car maker is testing gas alternatives. Toyota and Honda are additional along than Ford. Both companies have got hydrogen-powered cars. Toyota have a H version of the Prius.

How about the underside line?

According to the release, these new hydrogen-powered buses cost $250,000, which is $180,000 more than than Ford's typical gas-powered bus. These costs are expected to drop if mass production were engaged.

The vehicles have got got a max scope of 150-200 miles, which is good for parking batch shuttles, and they're only showing to be up to 13% More fuel-efficient.

On the bright side, these H vehicles have fewer emissions.

When you look at the technological spectrum, John Ford is dragging its feet and that's 1 ground why I don't like the stock. If you're looking to put in a "best of breed" company, John Ford isn't the stock play.

Alma tourism committee tables proposed lodging tax

.

A proposed 5 percent lodging tax on bed and breakfast and motel rooms in Alma was tabled after business owners opposed it.But the Alma Parks and Recreation Committee said the business community needed to work together with the city council to help the city attract tourists.A room tax was viewed as a method of raising revenue from tourists to help pay for upkeep of parks and public recreation services.The city council says it is spending too much compared to other small cities. Most of the money comes from property taxes.Peggy Jost, owner of the Hillcrest Motel in Alma, said she received a “mixed response” from business owners she approached about giving donations to the city as an alternative to the tax.Jost said a room tax would drive away visitors. She said guests would look for lodging elsewhere.She said several people told her it is the city’s obligation to have money set aside for maintenance of parks and recreation.Some suggested Alma charge a citywide sales tax, but City Administrator Linda Torgerson said Wisconsin law doesn’t allow a small city to impose a municipal sales tax.The only alternative tax available to the city for raising revenue to help support tourism is a room tax.The law provides that a majority of room tax revenue must be used for tourism-related promotions, Torgerson said.Alma Mayor Lois Balk and city Alderman Larry Farl, a local business owner, said a change in mindset would be necessary if the city and businesses were going to do a better job of working together to solve funding problems.Farl said the Alma Chamber of Commerce and businesses might have to do more to improve fundraising activities in cooperation with the city to help fund local tourism.Balk recommended the community talk about tourism and come up with new ideas for raising revenue.
.